








 |
CGMH
Administration
Center |
No.199, Tunghwa Rd.,
Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C |

886-2-27135211 |
|
|
|
Anesthetic Management of a Parturient Undergoing
Cesarean Section with a Tracheal Tumor and Hemoptysis |
|
Yuet-Tong Ng, MD
Wai-Meng Lau, MD
Chun-Cheung Yu, MD
Jing-Ru Hsieh, MD
Peter Chi-Ho Chung, MD
|
 |
 |
| Anesthetic management of a parturient with respiratory
failure associated with hemoptysis, dyspnea, and orthopnea
is difficult. An anesthesiologist should realize that the
patient's major problem is not solved during the surgery.
This circumstance is similar to a patient with associated
cardiac disease scheduled for non-cardiac surgery. General
anesthesia with endotracheal intubation can provide safe oxygenation
for both the parturient and the fetus, but with possible unexpected
massive hemoptysis and tumor seeding. Prolonged intubation
may delay the patient's pulmonary treatment course. Laryngeal
mask anesthesia can provide an airway, but must not be secured
due to the risk of aspiration. The need of high doses of inhalation
drugs may hinder uterine contractions. The addition of a muscle
relaxant will change the patient's respiratory patterns and
physiology. Regional anesthesia alone might not be tolerated.
A decrease in cough strength, as well as dyspnea, orthopnea,
and hyperventilation may be harmful to both the parturient
and the fetus. However, we successfully managed this case
using epidural anesthesia combined with assisted mask ventilation
instead of spontaneous breathing usually provided by a simple
mask in almost all American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA)
class I-II parturients during cesarean section. The anesthetic
level was maintained at T8 with 18 ml of 2% Xylocaine mixed
with 2 ml of 7% sodium bicarbonate with 1:200,000 epinephrine
epidurally and with the patient in a supine position with
the head up at 30o to prevent cephalic spreading and to ensure
better pulmonary ventilation. (Chang Gung Med J 2003;26:70-5)
KeywordsĦG
epidural anesthesia, parturient, respiratory failure, hemoptysis. |
| |
 |
| For a parturient with hemoptysis and limited pulmonary reserves,
no anesthesiologist is able to ascertain whether regional or
general anesthesia would be the best choice and safest method
for cesarean section (C/S) delivery even in a parturient with
lung cancer involving the trachea. We successfully managed a
parturient with such a complicated respiratory condition undergoing
C/S by using epidural anesthesia combined with assisted mask
ventilation.
CASE REPORT
A 33-year-old pregnant patient, G5P2AA2, was scheduled to
receive a cesarean section for delivery due to lung cancer
with respiratory impairment. She suffered copious coughing
with whitish sputum and progressive body weight loss of more
than 10 kg since the 29th gestational week. She had been treated
for a common cold, but symptoms persisted, and advanced study
for tuberculosis was negative. At a gestational age of 34
weeks, dyspnea and hemoptysis became obvious. Left lower lobe
consolidation and atelectasis were noted on a chest roentgenogram
(Fig. 1). Direct bronchoscopy with bronchial brushing for
histological and pathological examination proved adenosquamous
carcinoma (Fig. 2). The oncologist then suggested palliative
radiotherapy, and C/S for delivery was highly recommended
by the obstetrician.
On the day before the operation, the patient demonstrated
frequent coughing with hemoptysis, orthopnea, and tachypnea
with a respiratory rate of 33 bpm. Arterial blood gas under
a nasal cannula at 3l/min demonstrated pH 7.415, PaO2 99 mmHg,
PCO2 21.8 mmHg, HCO3 14.0 mmol/l, and BE -7.5 mmol/l. Laboratory
examination showed a platelet count of 536ĦÑ103; prothrombin
time and activated partial thromboplastin time were within
normal limits. Because of the surgery, a discussion between
anesthesiologists took place; the possible anesthetic course
and outcome were weighed against the potentially fatal clinical
conditions. On arrival at the operating theatre, an arterial
line, pulse oximetry, and electrocardiogram monitoring were
first set up. Meanwhile, an oxygen mask using 6 l/min was
used on the patient for spontaneous breathing in a semi-sitting
position. Arterial blood gas (ABG) data for further evaluation
showed pH 7.453, PaO2 140.6 mmHg, PaCO2 30.2 mmHg, HCO3- 21.2
mmol/l, BE -2.9 mmol/l, and SaO2 100%. Then with the patient
in the right lateral knee-chest position with head up at 30o,
an epidural catheter was inserted into the L4-5 interspace
using the loss of resistance technique. A mixture of 18 ml
of 2% lidocaine and 2 ml of 7% sodium bicarbonate with 1:200,000
epinephrine was administered in incremental doses of 5 ml
to a total of 20 ml. A surgical level of sensory anesthesia
was achieved of from T8 to S5. Because of the poor pulmonary
reserve, hydration was difficult to adjust, and an elastic
bandage was applied to both lower extremities. Ephedrine was
prepared and was available to counteract hypotension should
the blood pressure fall. After induction, the breathing device
was changed to assist ventilation with oxygen therapy of FiO2
of 1.0 in order to fit the patient's need. The respiratory
rate changed to 22 bpm, but hemoptysis still bothered her.
In order to avoid further cephalic spreading of the local
anesthetics and to achieve a better respiratory condition,
the patient was placed in a semi-sitting position with the
head up at 30o. A further recheck of the ABGs revealed satisfactory
data. The course of the operation was smooth despite the patient
complaining of some discomfort during traction of the peritoneum,
but this was easily solved by sedation with intravenous administration
of 50 mg pethidine after cord clamping. A transient drop in
blood pressure with refractory tachycardia after oxytocin
infusion was solved by intravenous administration of 8 mg
of ephedrine. Although the patient was sedated, respiration
was smooth with a rate of 22 bpm under assisted mask ventilation.
A 2840-g female baby, with Apgar scores of 7 and 8 at 1 and
5 min, respectively, was delivered. Umbilical cord blood analysis
demonstrated acceptable data with no metabolic acidosis. When
the patient had recovered spontaneous breathing and consciousness,
she was transferred to the medical intensive care unit for
post-surgical care. After 2 days of intensive care with stable
vital signs, she was transferred to the general ward for further
evaluation and treatment of her pulmonary problems.
DISCUSSION
In general, either regional or general anesthesia is safe
and presents no difficulty in a parturient scheduled for C/S
in American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class I or II.
However, when anesthetizing a parturient with compromised
cardiopulmonary disorder, special attempts and a detailed
evaluation should be taken into consideration. In this case,
the patient suffered from respiratory impairment and complained
of extreme difficulty with lying in a supine position when
awake. It seems that the priority of regional blockage was
thus lost, and general anesthesia could provide a safe way
for steady hemodynamics and oxygenation for both the parturient
and the fetus. Actually, anesthetic management of this case
might be even more difficult than managing a case with lung
cancer scheduled for tumor resection. Anesthesiologists should
realize that the patient's major problem will not be solved
during this surgery, and secondary trauma should be minimized
in order to provide the chance for the patient to continue
her therapeutic course of treating her major problem. This
circumstance is similar to a patient with associated cardiac
disease scheduled for non-cardiac surgery.
When devising an anesthetic plan for such a parturient with
lung cancer with dyspnea, cough with sputum, and even hemoptysis
undergoing cesarean section, anesthesiologists should first
weigh the risks and benefits of either regional or general
anesthesia.
A sufficient level of regional anesthesia can usually provide
excellent operating conditions with good maternal comfort
and neonatal outcome in a normal parturient undergoing C/S.
However, this might impair the abdominal muscle function and
cough strength in a patient with respiratory failure. In addition,
an awake parturient with respiratory compromise may find it
difficult to lie in a supine position for regional blockage.
A study of nonpregnant patients using low spinal anesthesia
showed a decrease in cough strength of 34% and 94% with upper
thoracic blockade,(1) while midthoracic levels of epidural
sensory blockade decreased cough strength by only 38%.(2)
In this patient, because of the limited pulmonary reserve,
even a small change in positioning would cause her to complain
of orthopnea, and she might show clinical signs of hyperventilation
with shallow breathing. A further decrease in muscle strength
might cause her condition to deteriorate, and endotracheal
intubation would be the inevitable outcome to maintain life
support.
General anesthesia can not only provide safe oxygenation for
both the parturient and the fetus, but can also ensure the
quality of operative conditions for the surgeon. A more stable
hemodynamic status for the parturient can be maintained. However,
from another point of view, an anesthesiologist must face
the possible events of aspiration pneumonia. During induction
of general anesthesia, because of a smaller functional residual
capacity coupled with an increase in oxygen consumption, the
risk of hypoxemia with maternal apnea can be prominent.(3)
Prolonged maternal hyperventilation may produce fetal asphyxia
with severe hypoxemia and metabolic acidosis.(4) In addition,
profuse bronchial secretions, coughing, straining, and prolonged
elimination of inhalation anesthetics can cause complicated
consequences.
General anesthesia with endotracheal intubation might have
been more harmful to this parturient. First, bronchoscopy
examination at 34 weeks of the pregnancy clearly demonstrated
tumor invasion to the trachea, carina, and even to the left
main bronchus with an indication of easy bleeding. Sliding
an endotracheal tube inside the trachea would have probably
increased the chance of traumatic tumor bleeding and even
distal tumor seeding. Second, massive hemoptysis with positive
pressure ventilation has also been reported with a nearly
fatal outcome.(5) This can induce maternal hypoxemia with
ultimate fetal asphyxia. Third, prolonged intubation might
increase the risk of pneumonia, and difficult weaning from
mechanical ventilation would increase the time and the costs
of post-critical care and would thus have delayed her pulmonary
treatment program. The use of a laryngeal mask (LMA) should
only be considered in obstetric patients in the pre-induction
period; it can provide a method to secure an airway, but endotracheal
replacement under direct fiberoptic bronchoscope was finally
indicated.(6) The need for a high dose of inhalation drugs
in LMA may hinder uterine contractions, and the concomitant
addition of muscle relaxants might also change the patient's
respiratory patterns and respiratory physiology. If prolonged
intubation is indicated, an exchange of tubing would be recommended
as described previously.
Considering these circumstances, an anesthetic method of epidural
anesthesia plus assisted mask ventilation was highly indicated
in this patient instead of spontaneous breathing given using
a simple mask in almost all ASA class I-II parturients during
a C/S. In addition, a semi-sitting position with the head
up at 30o will decrease the shunt effect, and assisted mask
ventilation by the anesthesiologist will also mask the unwanted
effects of the limited pulmonary reserve. Monitoring of the
airway pressure, end-tidal CO2, and O2 saturation provided
a safer environment for anesthesia. The patient's metabolic
needs and a slowing down of the respiratory rate were achieved
by an adequate minute ventilation with a skillful hand. The
level and density of the blockade were well controlled to
minimize motor weakness and respiratory compromise.(7) With
careful attention and thorough preoperative evaluation associated
with the choice of anesthetic technique best suited to an
individual patient's needs, a parturient with such respiratory
compromise can pass the peripartum period without undue difficulty. |
 |
 |
| REFERENCES
1. Egbert LD, Tamersy K, Deas TC. Pulmonary function
during spinal anesthesia: The mechanism of cough depression.
Anesthesiology 1961;22:882-5.
2. Sharrock NE, Castellano P, Sanborn KV,
Mineo Robert. Correlation of cough strength and hemodynamics
with recovery from sensory block during epidural anesthesia.
Reg Anesth 1989:14:S87.
3. Moya F, Morishima HO, Shnider SM, James
LS. Influence of maternal hyperventilation on the new born
infant. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1965;91:76-84.
4. Motoyama EK, Rivard D, Acheson F, Cook
CD. Adverse effects of maternal hyperventilation on the foetus.
Lancet 1966;1(7423):268-8.
5. Wang YL, Hong CL, Chung HS, Ho AC, Yu
CL, Liu HP, Lee YH, Tan PP. Massive hemoptysis after the initiation
of positive pressure ventilation in a patient with pulmonary
tuberculosis. Anesthesiology 2000;92:1480-2.
6. Mark Godley, Reddy A.R.R. Use of LMA for
awake intubation for Caesarean Section. Can J Anesth 1996;43:299-302.
7. Gazioglu K, Kaltreider NL, Rosen M, Yu
PN. Pulmonary function during pregnancy in normal women and
in patients with cardiopulmonary disease. Thorax 1970;25:
445-50. |
 |
 |
| From From the Department of Anesthesiology, Chung Gung
Memorial Hospital, Keelung.
Received: Jan. 16, 2002; Accepted: May 21, 2002
Address for reprints: Dr. Peter Chi-Ho Chung, Department of
Anesthesiology, Keelung Chung Gung Memorial Hospital. 222,
Mai-Chin Road, Keelung 200, Taiwan, R.O.C. Tel.: 886-2-24313131
ext. 2777; Fax: 886-2-24313161; E-mail: p654084@cgmh.org.tw |
|