Ħ@HomeĦ@Ħ@HomeĦ@
ĦDnewsĦDĦDclinicĦDĦDlinksĦDĦDsitemapĦD









CGMH
Administration
Center
No.199, Tunghwa Rd.,
Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C

886-2-27135211
Home > Chang Gung Medical Journal > Vol.25 No.12

Educational Reform: Problem-Based Learning at
Chang Gung University, An Overview

DISCUSSION

In the UICC's TNM classification for gastric cancer, a residual tumor or tumor load after gastric surgery is also listed as 1 of the determinant predictors of survival.(16) After palliative surgery, patients with microscopic residual tumors survived longer than those with macroscopic residual tumors. It is well recognized that palliative resection produces a longer survival than non-resection surgery.(6,17-19) Patients survived longer after a gastrojejunostomy or a laparotomy only compared to those who had intubation surgery in other and our own series,(6,7,17) because intubation surgery is usually performed on patients in a later stage such as those with extensive peritoneal carcinomatosis. However some series failed to show any differences in survival between the two.(12,19)
Symptomatic palliation or quality of life is as an important survival benefit as operative safety in selecting surgical procedures for patients with far-advanced gastric cancer.(12) Resection is currently accepted as the most effective procedure for symptomatic palliation.(5-7) The palliative effect after gastric resection endured longer than that after non-resectional procedures.(12) Whenever feasible, gastric resection should be the first choice. Our study supports distal gastrectomy being the best palliative surgery, but it is indicated only for cancers of the distal stomach.
Non-resectional surgery provides only very limited palliation. Gastric outlet obstruction is the most frequent indication for non-resection procedures. A gastrojejunostomy can effectively relieve the obstruction, allowing resumption of an oral diet following the operation. However, some do not consider it satisfactory palliation, because the bypass function can not be maintained as long as patients will survive.(11) Therefore, it is not recommended whenever gastric resection is feasible.(6,7,11) Intubation is the operation of last choice for gastric outlet obstruction.(6) The feeding function of a jejunostomy can be maintained for only 1.4 months on average, which is too short to render it a worthwhile palliative procedure.
Postoperative gastric stasis following a gastrojejunostomy occurred in a high percentage (14.1%) of patients, most of whom had risk factors like a history of chronic obstruction or malnutrition before the operation.(20) A temporal feeding jejunostomy should be added for cases of chronic gastric outlet obstruction. It can serve as a feeding port for enteral nutrition, once gastric stasis develops.
The mortality and morbidity rates of palliative surgery were significantly greater than those following curative resection in other and our own studies.(6,7,21) Anastomotic leakage is the main cause of operative mortality following gastric resection, whereas disease progression is the most common cause of hospital death following non-resection procedures. For cancers of the distal stomach, a bypass or gastrojejunostomy can be performed to avoid the mortality and morbidity of a gastrectomy in high-risk patients. However, for cancers of the proximal third of the stomach, a bypass operation is seldom performed to take the place of a total gastrectomy for high-risk patients. In the R2-resection group, the percentage of patients with total gastrectomies (41.6%) was much higher than that in the R0 (26.2%) or R1 group (32.7%). This may explain why R2 total gastrectomies had a particularly higher operative mortality than did R1 and R2 distal gastrectomies or R1 total gastrectomies in this series.
From logistic regression analysis, we identified peritoneal seeding, very old age (> 80 years), and severe medical diseases as the most important risk factors influencing the operative mortality of patients who underwent gastric resection (Table 4). The proportion of patients of a very old age or with severe medical diseases did not differ in gastrectomized patients of the various residual tumor groups. However, a higher proportion of peritoneal seeding was particularly noted in patients receiving R2 total gastrectomies. This provides another reason for the high mortality of R2 total gastrectomies among our patients.
Some clinicians disapprove of a total gastrectomy as a palliative procedure due to its high operative mortality and short survival times.(22,23) However, several recent reports did not oppose the use of a palliative total gastrectomy, suggesting that it is a relatively safe procedure compared to a distal gastrectomy.(7,8,19) Nevertheless, it is generally recognized that, for a better postoperative quality of life and nutritional status, total gastrectomies should not be performed en principle for all cases except for cancers of the proximal third of the stomach. The selection of a total gastrectomy must be stringent for R2 patients. We suggest that a total gastrectomy is an acceptable operation for R1 patients with cancers of the proximal third of the stomach, while it should be done selectively for R2 patients because of the high operative mortality. For R2 patients, a gastrectomy is not the only method of treatment for proximal-third cancers; instead, other treatment modalities such as trans-endoscopic stenting, laser therapy, and brachytherapy might be safer alternatives.(24,25)
Postoperative residual or occult tumor cells may continue to grow in patients following palliative surgery. Early aggressive chemotherapy is recommended for these patients.(26,27) A regimen, consisting of a weekly high-dose 5-FU and LV infusion, originally recommended for colon cancer, has been tried in our hospital.(15,28) The result of a phase II prospective trial revealed a partial response in 33.3% of 37 patients, in addition to an acceptable toxicity even in patients with a relatively poor performance status.(15) In this study, postoperative chemotherapy was demonstrated capable of improving the survival of incurable patients regardless of whether gastric resection was performed or not.
Recently some more-aggressive operations have been advocated for patients with distant metastasis to the para-aortic lymph nodes, liver, or peritoneum.(9,29) Para-aortic lymph node dissection prolonged the survival of patients if the number of metastatic para-aortic lymph nodes was m 3.(29) A combined hepatectomy for liver metastasis prolonged the survival time of patients with liver metastasis confined to 1 lobe.(18) For patients with peritoneal seeding, a 5-year survival of 24% was observed in a clinical trial (N=14) that utilized an extensive peritonectomy and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy, in addition to an extended gastrectomy.(10,30) For far-advanced cases, radical or aggressive surgery would certainly increase postoperative mortality and morbidity. Therefore, in the decision-making process for these aggressive operations, one must consider not only the survival benefits, but also the surgical risks and postoperative quality of life.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Cancer Unit of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan for financially supporting this research. Dr Ting-Chang Chang's contribution to the statistical analysis is also highly appreciated.

REFERENCES

1. Akoh JA, Macintyre IMC. Improving survival in gastric cancer: review of 5-year survival rates in English language publications from 1970. Br J Surg 1992;79:293-9.
2. Wanebo HJ, Kenedy BJ, Chmiel J, Steele G, Winchester D, Osteen R. Cancer of the stomach: a patient care study by the American College of Surgeons. Ann Surg 1993; 218:583-92.
3. Siewert JR, Bottcher K, Stein HJ, Roder JD, and the German Gastric Cancer Study Group. Relevant prognostic factors in gastric cancer: ten-year results of the German gastric cancer study. Ann Surg 1998;228:449-61.
4. Wang, CS, Hsieh CC, Chao TC, Jan YY, Jeng LB, Hwang TL, Chen MF, Chen PC, Chen JS, Hsueh S. Resectable gastric cancer: operative mortality and survival analysis. Chang Gung Med J 2002;25:216-27.
5. Ekbom GA, Gleysteen JJ. Gastric malignancy: resection for palliation. Surgery 1980:88:476-81.
6. Hallissey MT, Allum WH, Roginski C, Fielding JWL. Palliative surgery for gastric cancer. Cancer 1988;62:440-4.
7. Haugstvedt T. Benefit of resection in palliative surgery. Dig Surg 1994;11:121-5.
8. Monson JRT, Donohue JH, McIlrath DC, Farnell MB, Ilstrup DM. Total gastrectomy for advanced cancer: a worthwhile palliative procedure. Cancer 1991;68:1863-8.
9. Kikuchi S, Tsukamoto H, Mieno H, Sato K, Kobayashi N, Shimao H, Sakakibara Y, Hiki Y, Kabita A. Results of resection of gastric cancer with distant metastasis. Hepato-Gastroenterol 1998;45:592-6.
10. Yonemura Y, Fujimura T, Fushida S, Fujita H, Bando E, Nishimura G, Miwa K, Endou Y, Tanaka M, Sasaki T. A new surgical approach (peritonectomy) for the treatment of peritoneal dissemination. Hepato-Gastroenterol 1999; 46:601-9
11. Kikuchi S, Tsutumi O, Kobayashi N, Tsukamoto H, Shimao H, Sakakibara Y, Hiki Y, Kakita A. Does gastrojejunostomy for unresectable cancer of the gastric antrum offer satisfactory palliation? Hepato-Gastroenterol 1999; 46:584-7.
12. Ouchi K, Sugawara T, Ono H, Fujiya T, Kamiyama Y, Kakugawa Y, Mikuni J, Yamanami H. Therapeutic significance of palliative operations for gastric cancer for survival and quality of life. J Surg Oncology 1998;69:41-4.
13. Sobin LH, Wittekand CH, UICC. TNM classification of malignant tumors. 5th ed. Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag: UICC, International Union Against Cancer, 1997.
14. Japanese Research Society For Gastric Cancer. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma. First English edition, Kanehara & Co, LTD. Tokyo 1995.
15. Lin YC, Liu HE, Wang CH, Wang HM, Yang TS, Liau CT, Chen JS. Clinical benefit and response in patients with gastric cancer to weekly 24-hour infusion of high-dose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV). Anticancer Res 1999;19:5615-20.
16. Bonenkamp JJ, Sassako M, Hermans J, van de Velde CJ. Tumor load and surgical palliation in gastric cancer. Hepato-Gastroenterol 2001;48:1219-21.
17. Crookes PF, Incarbone R, Peters JH, Engle S, Bremner CG, DeMeester TR. A selective therapeutic approach to gastric cancer in a large public hospital. Am J Surg 1995; 170:602-5.
18. Kakeji Y, Maehara Y, Tomoda M, Kabashima A, Ohmori M, Oda S, Ohno S, Sugimachi K. Long term survival of patients with stage IV gastric cancer. Cancer 1998;82: 2307-11.
19. Doglietto BG, Pacelli F, Caprino P, Alfieri S, Carriero C, Malerba M, Crucitti F. Palliative surgery for far-advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective study on 305 consecutive patients. Am Surg 1999;36:352-5.
20. Bar-Natan M, Larson GM, Stephens G, Massey T. Delayed gastric emptying after gastric surgery. Am J Surg 1996;172:24-8
21. Wang CS, Chao TC, Hsueh S, Jeng LB, Jan YY, Chen SC, Hwang TL, Chen MF. Proximal third gastric adenocarcinoma: results of total gastrectomy by general surgeons and analysis of prognostic factors. J Surg Assoc ROC 1996;29:382-90.
22. ReMine WH. Palliative operations for incurable gastric cancer. World J Surg 1979;3:721-9.
23. Lawrence W. Jr, McNeer G. The effectiveness of surgery for palliation of incurable gastric cancer. Cancer 1958; 11:28-32.
24. Siersema PD, Schrauwen SL, van Blankenstein M, Steyerberg EW, van der Gaast A, Tilanus HW, Dees J, Rotterdam Esophageal Tumor Study Group. Self-expanding metal stents for complicated and recurrent esophagogastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;54:579-86.
25. Spencer GM, Thorpe SM, Blackman GM, Solano J, Tobias JS, Lovat LB, Bown SG. Laser augmented by brachytherapy versus laser alone in the palliation of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and cardia: a randomized study. Gut 2002;50:224-7.
26. Maehara Y, Sugimachi K, Akagi M, Kakegawa T, Shimazu H, Tomita M. Early postoperative chemotherapy following noncurative resection for patients with advanced gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 1992;65:413-6.
27. Hanazaki K, Mochizuki Y, Machida T, Yokoyama H, Sodeyama H, Sode Y, Wakabayashi M, Kawamura N, Miyazaki T. Postoperative chemotherapy in non-curative gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Hepato-Gastroenterol 1999;46:1238-43.
28. Ardalan B, Chua L, Tian EM, Reddy R, Sridhar K, Benedetto P, Richman S, Legaspi A, Waldman S, Morrell L, Feun L, Savaraj N, Livinstone A. A phase II study of weekly 24-hour infusion with high dose 5-fluorouracil with leucovorin in colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 1991;19:625-30.
29. Kunisaki C, Shimad H, Yamaoka H, Takahashi M, Okuno K, Akiyama H, Nomura M, Moriwaki Y. Indications for paraaortic lymph node dissection in gastric cancer patients with paraaortic lymph node involvement. Hepato-Gastroenterol 2000;47:586-9.
30. Sugarbaker PH, Yonemura Y. Palliation with a glimmer of hope: management of respectable gastric cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Hepato-Gastroenterol 2001; 48:1238-47.

Presentation: A portion of the contents of this paper were presented at the 38th World Congress of Surgery of the International Society of Surgery/Societe Internationale de Chirurgie (ISS/SIC) in Viena, Austria during International Surgical Week ISW99, August 17, 1999.
From the Department of General Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei; Chang Gung University, Taoyuan.
Received: Jun. 10, 2002; Accepted: Sep. 3, 2002
Address for reprints: Dr. Chia-Siu Wang, Department of General Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. 6, West Chia-Pu Road, Putzi City, Chiayi, Taiwan 613, R.O.C. Tel.: 886-5-3621000 ext. 2752; Fax: 886-5-3623002; E-mail: wangcs@cgmh.org.tw

 
Ħ@comming soonĦ@
 back  top
 back  top ĦDTraditional ChineseĦD ĦDSimplified ChineseĦD