








 |
CGMH
Administration
Center |
No.199, Tunghwa Rd.,
Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C |

886-2-27135211 |
|
|
|
Receptor-Dependent and Genomic-Independent
Actions of Estrogen in Vascular Protection |
 |
 |
 |
|
Functional evidence for a rapid, receptor-dependent and genomic-independent
action of estrogen in vascular cells continues to accumulate.
Although the nature of the receptor is not yet clear, some
of the hormone-induced effects can be blocked by known estrogen
antagonists (e.g., ICI 182,780) and can be mimicked by membrane-impermeable
forms of estrogen. Because the endothelial output of nitric
oxide (NO) is a major regulator of several cardiovascular
functions, regulation of NO production has received a lot
of attention as a potential mechanism for the cardiovascular
protection offered by estrogen. There is ample evidence that
estrogen can stimulate NO production and activate endothelial
NO synthase (eNOS) both in vitro and in vivo. Recent investigations
have shown that estrogen's rapid stimulatory action on eNOS
is mediated by the activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase
(PI3-K) and protein kinase B (PKB)/Akt pathway among other
signaling systems. Although these effects are estrogen receptor-dependent,
they are rapid (on the order of a few minutes) and transcription-independent
and thus represent genomic-independent but receptor-mediated
effects of a steroid operating in vascular cells. In this
review, recent evidence for such mechanisms is summarized,
and the role of estrogen receptors in vivo is also briefly
discussed. (Chang Gung Med J 2002;25:636-44)
Key words: estrogen, nitric oxide, estrogen receptor, endothelial
nitric oxide synthase, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, vascular
functions.
Gender differences in cardiovascular mortality and morbidity
exist,(1) and estrogens confer protection against atherosclerotic
disease.(2) The female hormone, estrogen (mainly 17b-estradiol),
causes a significant lipid-lowering effect; however, this
effect can only account for a portion (~1/3) of the atheroprotective
actions of E2.(3,4) Evidence shows that E2 exerts direct protective
effects on blood vessels including an increase in vasodilatation
and a reduction in vascular injury response as well as in
the development of atherosclerosis.(5) Although the general
functions of estrogen (E2) and the mechanisms through the
'classic' (genomic) estrogen receptor (ER) to bring about
these functions have been extensively investigated and reviewed,(6)
recent evidence indicates that a receptor-dependent but genomic-independent
action of E2 may play a role in the widely observed phenomena
of vascular protection offered by E2.(7) The goal of this
brief review is thus to summarize the current understanding
of this particular mode of E2's action.
Estrogen exerts diverse effects on the cardiovascular system
including systemic effects such as lowering circulating cholesterol
as well as direct vascular effects such as enhancing endothelium-dependent
relaxation, and the actions may occur rapidly or only after
the prolonged presence of E2.(5,8,9) Currently, two estrogen
receptors (ERa and ERb) are known, and both are expressed
in vascular endothelial cells (ECs) and smooth muscle cells
(VSMCs) and in myocardial cells.(9) They belong to the steroid/thyroid
hormone superfamily of transcription factors(10) and can regulate
gene expression in both E2-dependent and -independent manners.(6)
However, since the genomic action of E2 usually requires a
period of time (on the order of a few hours) to be implemented,
a rapid (on the order of a few minutes) response to E2 or
a similar response to the membrane-impermeable form of E2
(e.g., E2 conjugated with bovine serum albumin) cannot be
accounted for by the classic mode of nuclear ER's action.
In this review, evidence and a potential mechanism for such
a rapid, ER-dependent, yet genomic-independent action of E2
is evaluated, with emphasis on the role of phosphatidylinositol
3-kinase (PI3-K). The physiological as well as the pathophysiological
significance of ER-mediated responses are discussed.
I. Rapid, Receptor-dependent Actions of E2
More than 20 years ago, E2's rapid action was first demonstrated
in neurons where potassium currents were activated within
seconds.(11) Following these findings, several G protein-coupled
receptors including m-opioid and b-adrenergic receptors were
found to be affected via rapid protein kinase C and/or indirectly
by protein kinase A signaling induced by E2 in neuroendocrine
cells.(12) Recent studies of vascular ECs have presented a
different picture, and several physiological effects other
than the rapid electrophysiological responses have also been
observed. A list of recent representative studies with cultured
ECs is given in Table 1. It is clear that a major function
of endothelium in the production of nitric oxide (NO) has
been the focus of current investigations.
Because vascular endothelial dysfunction is recognized as
a major component in most cardiovascular disorders and endothelial
NO synthase (eNOS or NOS III) is vital in maintaining the
integrity of endothelium, the regulation of eNOS is the key
event in understanding vascular responses induced by physiological
(e.g., hormones) or pathophysiological (e.g., oxidative stress)
changes.(13-16) Transcriptional regulation and post-translational
regulation characterized by subcellular translocation and
covalent modifications such as phosphorylation, acylation,
and protein-protein association with calmodulin and caveolin
of the eNOS protein have been reviewed.(13,17) Table 1 illustrates
that shortly (on the order of a few minutes) following E2
stimulation both phosphorylation via mitogen-activated protein
kinase (MAPK) and PI3-K protein kinase B (PKB, or Akt) signaling
and protein-protein association with heat shock protein have
been reported in EC. Most of these studies have also reported
that these rapid actions of E2 stimulate eNOS activity and
result in a rapid release of NO.(18-22) Evidence that these
actions of E2 are ER-dependent is based on observations that
they are inhibitable by ER antagonists such as ICI 182,780.
Furthermore, these actions are not the consequence of classic
genomic-dependent effects of nuclear ER because (1) a membrane-impermeable
agonist (e.g., E2BSA) is similarly effective;(18,22) (2) a
rapid response (on the order of a few minutes) is observed;(18-21,23)
and (3) the actions are transcription-independent.(18,19,21)
Taken together, these results strongly indicate that E2 causes
rapid, ER-dependent but genomic-independent stimulation of
eNOS activity via MAPK or PI3-K/PKB signaling pathways in
cultured ECs. Involvement of the activation of ionic channels,
the generation of cyclic nucleotides, and GPCR signaling during
the rapid E2 action have been reviewed elsewhere.(7,24) Therefore,
we only discuss recent evidence for this particular mode of
signaling system, i.e., the PI3-K and PKB/Akt pathways elicited
by E2 resulting in the stimulation of eNOS and the generation
of endothelium-derived NO that have often been proven responsible
for the observed vascular protection.
II. PI3-K Signaling
PI3-K is a family of lipid kinases that can phosphorylate
the D-3 position of the inositol ring of phosphoinositide
lipid to form phosphatidylinositol (PtdIns) (3) phosphate
(PtdIns (3)P), PtdIns(4,5)-bisphosphate (PtdIns(4,5)P2), and
PtdIns(3,4,5)P3. PI3-K can be divided into 3 classes on the
basis of their in vitro specificity to the lipid substrate,
structure, and mode of regulation: class IA and IB (all lipids
as substrates), class IIC2a, (PtdIns and PtdIns(4)P as substrates),
and class III (PtdIns as the only substrate). These lipids
then bind to the pleckstrin homology (PH) domain of several
proteins including PtdIns(3,4,5) P3-dependent protein kinase-1
(PDK-1), serine/threonine protein kinases such as PKB/Akt,
Brutons tyrosine kinase, and several guanine-nucleotide exchange
proteins of the Rho family GTPases.(25-29) These molecules
are activated by many extracellular stimuli and have been
implicated in a wide range of cellular processes, including
metabolic control, cell cycle progression, cell growth, cell
motility and adhesion, and cell survival.(25,26,28,29) We
concentrated on some recent studies in cultured vascular cells
(ECs and VSMCs) and in isolated rat arteries to illustrate
a variety of stimuli including physical challenges (e.g.,
balloon injury or shear stress) and hormonal factors (e.g.,
adrenomedullin and angiotensin II) which were found capable
of activating the PI3-K signaling system and eventually leading
to a protective effect often associated with enhanced NO production
(Table 2). First, eNOS activity was increased through direct
serine phosphorylation by PKB/Akt, indicating that the PI3-K
connection in COS-7 cells (which do not express NOS) was co-transfected
with eNOS and Akt as well as in mvECs,(30) bovine aortic ECs
(BAECs),(31) and human umbilical vein ECs (HUVECs).(32) Second,
both vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and insulin
were found to stimulate NO production via a PI3-K-inhibitor
(wild type (WT) and/or LY)-sensitive mechanism in HUVECs,(33,34)
suggesting that different stimuli utilize PI3-K signaling
to activate eNOS in the same cell. Third, in VSMCs, PI3-K
activation is involved in angiotensin II-induced DNA synthesis
and cell proliferation through generation of reactive oxygen
species (ROS), a process which is likely involved in the proliferation
of VSMCs during vascular injury.(35,36) In fact, medial replication
following balloon injury to rat arteries was found to be associated
with PKB/Akt phosphorylation.(23) Furthermore, the finding
that adrenomedullin enhances endothelium-dependent relaxation
of intact rat aorta via Akt phosphorylation suggests that
the PI3-K-PKB/Akt signaling system may play an important role
in the homeostasis of vascular structure and function.(37)
The evidence thus has demonstrated that the PI3-K-PKB/Akt
signaling system is activated through the ER-dependent vascular
action of E2, as part of a program to stimulate eNOS for enhanced
endothelial NO production in a genomic-independent manner
(Table 1). In addition to the action of E2, a host of stimuli
including other hormones and shear stress also utilizes the
PI3-K pathway to activate eNOS in cultured ECs as well as
in arterial tissue (Table 2). The involvement of PI3-K-eNOS
coupling is neither limited to E2 action nor to ECs alone,(23,35,36)
indicating the important position of PI3-K in the regulation
of vascular homeostasis. Figure 1 summarizes the possibilities
of ER-dependent vascular regulation mediated by E2 which includes
genomic actions, the PI3-K-eNOS pathway, and other non-genomic
effects (e.g., via MAPK or Ca++ fluxes).(38,39) The rapid
non-genomic actions of E2 are likely to be triggered after
E2 binding to a membrane component for signal transduction.
However, the nature of such a plasma membrane ER is unknown,
and its molecular structures have been proposed to be a protein
unrelated to nuclear ER or a nuclear ER.(40)
III. Role of Cardiovascular ER in vivo
The above evidence, albeit strong, is mostly derived from
in vitro investigations focusing on rapid PI3-K-mediated vascular
actions of E2. With the development of transgenic animal models,
the physiological and pathophysiological roles of ER have
also been examined in ER knockout (KO) mice. Two estrogen
receptors, ERa and ERb, encoded in separate genes, have been
characterized(41-43) and were found to be expressed in both
ECs(44) and VSMCs.(45) Although early studies using an ovariectomized
(OVX) ERaKO model and carotid arterial injury showed that
E2's inhibition of vascular injury was independent of ERa,(46)
later investigations with transgenic animals demonstrated
that ERa and/or ERb were involved in the E2-elicited vascular
protection (Table 3). However, the results were by no means
simple or unequivocal to interpret and require careful considerations
of various conditions of the animal model. In a study designed
for obtaining unambiguous information, ovariectomized ERa,
bKO (in which both ERa and ERb were disrupted) mice and WT
littermates were investigated following carotid artery injury
with or without E2 administration.(47) It was found that E2
inhibited the increase in the vascular medial area (as an
index for injury) in WT mice but not in ERa,bKO mice, illustrating
an ER-dependent mechanism of E2 protection in reducing the
extent of injury.(47) However, E2 significantly increased
the uterine weight and also inhibited proliferation of VSMC
following injury to ERa,bKO mice, suggesting that either an
ER-independent mechanism, an unidentified ER subtype, or residual
activity of the ERa splice variant was involved in at least
some of the beneficial effects of E2.(47) These findings showed
that even application to mice harboring disruptions of both
ERa and ERb genes could not resolve the multiple possibilities
of ER-mediated signaling in all target tissues. Furthermore,
the most recent reports from the same laboratory(47,48) have
added a new player to the game. In ERbKO mice, VSMCs and blood
vessels were found to exhibit functional abnormalities, and
E2 augmented vasoconstriction instead of vasorelaxation, which
may be related to iNOS and the potassium ion channel.(48)
Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure increased in ERbKO
mice, indicating that ERb may control important functions
of vascular physiology involving iNOS in both genders.(49)
Interestingly, in primary human VSMCs, transfection with ERb
or ERa resulted in the opposite effect on the iNOS reporter
gene, and transfection of both ERs resulted in intermediate
activation of the reporter.(48) It has also been shown that
basal NO production was increased in OVX-ERbKO mice in response
to E2, whereas this effect was abolished in OVX-ERbKO mice,(49)
suggesting that it is ERa, not ERb, that mediates the beneficial
effect of E2 on basal NO production. Therefore, it appears
that E2's protective effect on vascular functions may involve
both ERa and ERb as well as both eNOS and iNOS; it may exert
its effects on both endothelium-dependent and -independent
parameters,(48,49) and at times, the actions of ERa and ERb
(e.g., iNOS induction) may antagonize each other.(48) Whether
the rapid PI3-K-eNOS pathway is also involved in the long-term
ER-dependent action of E2 has not been directly examined yet.
Table 3 also lists a couple of examples illustrating E2's
cardioprotective actions.(50,51)
IV. Conclusions
Vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cells exhibit ER in
both women and men,(9) and ERa activates specific target genes
(Fig. 1). In addition, rapid nongenomic effects involving
ERa (Tables 1, 2) do not require alterations in gene expression
but may activate a rapid signaling system, e.g., PI3-K-PKB/Akt(18,21)
or a protein-protein association, e.g., ER and HSP90,(20)
to induce vasodilatation via the eNOS-NO pathway. In postmenopausal
women, E2 causes short-term dilatation of coronary and brachial
arteries, mediated largely by the enhanced production of NO.
This and other findings(8,9) indicate that rapid ER-dependent
activation of eNOS is consistent with the observed vasodilatation
and may play an important role in the benefits associated
with E2.
The observed gender difference in vascular physiology and
the protective role of E2 in pathophysiology are interesting
and elaborate, with many confounding factors. The multiplicity
of interrelated elements, including social, personal, systemic,
and local (vascular cell) origins,(52) renders experimental
approaches to understanding E2's protective actions difficult,
sometimes even elusive. Although some 40 observational studies
have suggested that women who take E2 or hormone replacement
therapy (HRT) exhibit a lower risk of coronary heart disease
(CHD) than non-takers,(53,54) randomized trials with preexisting
CHD and secondary prevention trials have not confirmed the
cardioprotective effect of E2 or HRT.(55) The recent AHA Scientific
Statement(56) should be consulted for readers who are interested
in these apparent discrepancies.
Acknowledgments
The work from the author's laboratory was supported by grants
CMRP736, CMRP990, NSC89-2320-B-182-027, and NSC89-2320-B-182-068.
I thank Ms. L.Y. Chen for her excellent assistance in preparing
the manuscript.
|
 |
 |
|
REFERENCES
1. Isles CG, Hole DJ, Hawthorne VM, Lever AF. Relation
between coronary risk and coronary mortality in women of the
Refew and Paisely survey: Comparison with men. Lancet 1992;339:702-6.
2. Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA. Estrogen replacement therapy
and coronary heart disease: A quantitative assessment of the
epidemiologic evidence. Preventive Med 1991;20:47-63.
3. Grady D, Rubin SM, Petitti DB. Hormone therapy to
prevent disease and prolong life in postmenopausal women.
Ann Intern Med 1992;117:1016-37.
4. Mendelsohn ME, Karas RH. Estrogen and the blood
vessel wall. Curr Opin Cardiol 1994;9:619-26.
5. Farhat MY, Lavigne MC, Ramwell PW. The vascular protective
effects of estrogen. FASEB J 1996;10:615-24.
6. Nilsson S, Makela S, Treuter E. Mechanisms of estrogen
action. Physiol. Rev 2001;81:1535-65.
7. Kelly MJ, Levin ER. Rapid actions of plasma membrane
estrogen receptors. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2001;12: 152-6.
8. Selzman CH, Whitehill TA, Shames BD, Pulido EJ,
Cain BC, Harken AH. The biology of estrogen-mediated repair
of cardiovascular injury. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:868-74.
9. Mendelsohn ME, Karas RH. The protective effects
of estrogen on the cardiovascular system. New Engl J Med 1999;340:1801-11.
10. Mangelsdort DJ, Thummel C, Beato M, Herrlich P,
Schutz G, Umesono K, Blumberg B, Kastner P, Mark M, Chambon
P, Evans RM. The nuclear receptor superfamily: the second
decade. Cell 1995;83:835-39.
11. Kelly MJ, Moss RL, Dudley CA. Differential sensitivity
of preoptic-septal neurons to microelectrophoresed estrogen
during the estrous cycle. Brain Res 1976;114:152-7.
12. Kelly MJ, Wagner EJ. Estrogen modulation of G-protein-coupled
receptors. Trends Endocrinol Metab 1999;10: 369-74.
13. Michel T, Feron O. Nitric oxide and nitric oxide
synthases. J Clin Invest 1997;100:2146-52.
14. Shimokawa H. Primary endothelial dysfunction: atherosclerosis.
J Mol Cell Cardiol 1999;31:23-37.
15. Boulanger CM. Secondary endothelial dysfunction:
hypertension and heart failure. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1999; 31:39-49.
16. Ross R. Atherosclerosis-an inflammatory disease.
New Engl J Med 1999;340:115-25.
17. Nathan C, Xie QW. Regulation of biosynthesis of
nitric oxide. J Biol Chem 1994;269:13725-8.
18. Haynes MP, Sinha D, Russell KS, Collinge M, Fulton
D, Morales-Ruiz M, Sessa WC, Bender JR. Membrane estrogen
receptor engagement activates endothelial nitric oxide synthase
via the PI3-kinase-Akt pathway in human endothelial cells.
Circ Res 2000;87:677-82.
19. Chen Z, Yuhanna IS, Galcheva-Gargova Z, Karas RH,
Mendelsohn ME, Shaul PW. Estrogen receptor a mediates the
nongenomic activation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase
by estrogen. J Clin Invest 1999;103:401-6.
20. Russell KS, Haynes MP, Caulin-Glaser T, Rosneck
J, Sessa WC, Bender JR. Estrogen stimulates heat shock protein
90 binding to endothelial nitric oxide synthase in human vascular
endothelial cells. J Biol Chem 2000;275: 5026-30.
21. Simoncini T, Hafezi-Moghadam A, Brazil DP, Ley
K, Chin WW, Liao JK. Interaction of oestrogen receptor with
the regulatory subunit of phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase.
Nature 2000;407:538-41.
22. Russell KS, Haynes MP, Sinha D, Clerisme E, Bender
JR. Human vascular endothelial cells contain membrane binding
sites for estradiol, which mediate rapid intracellular signaling.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:5930-5.
23. Shigematsu K, Koyama H, Olson NE, Cho A, Reidy
MA. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling is important for
smooth muscle cell replication after arterial injury. Vasc
Biol 2000;20:2373-8.
24. Falkenstein E. Multiple actions of steroid hormones-a
focus on rapid, nongenomic effects. Pharmacol Rev 2000;52:513-56.
25. Cantrell DA. Phosphoinositide 3-kinase signaling
pathways. J Cell Sci 2001;114:1439-45.
26. Farese RV. Insulin-sensitive phospholipid signaling
systems and glucose transport. Exp Biol Med 2001;226:283-95.
27. Vanhaesebroeck B, Waterfield MD. Signaling by distinct
classes of phosphoinositide 3-kinases. Exp Cell Res 1999;253:239-54.
28. Rameh LE, Cantley LC. The role of phosphoinositide
3-kinase lipid products in cell function. J Biol Chem 1999;
274:8347-50.
29. Cohen P, Alessi DR, Cross DAE. PDK1, one of the
missing links in insulin signal transduction? FEBS Letters.
1997;410:3-10.
30. Fulton D, Gratton JP, McCabe TJ, Fontana J, Fujio
Y, Walsh K, Franke TF, Papapetropoulos A, Sessa WC. Regulation
of endothelium-derived nitric oxide production by the protein
kinase Akt. Nature 1999;399:597-601.
31. Gallis B, Corthals GL, Goodlett DR, Ueba H, Kim
F, Presnell SR, Figeys D, Harrison DG, Berk BC, Aebersold
R, Corson MA. Identification of flow-dependent endothelial
nitric-oxide synthase phosphorylation sites by mass spectrometry
and regulation of phosphorylation and nitric oxide production
by the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor LY294002. J
Biol Chem 1999;274:30101-8.
32. Dimmeler S, Fleming I, Fisslthaler B, Hermann C,
Busse R, Zeiher AM. Activation of nitric oxide synthase in
endothelial cells by Akt-dependent phosphorylation. Nature
1999;399:601-5.
33. Papapetropoulos A, Garcia-Cardena G, Madri JA,
Sessa WC. Nitric oxide production contributes to the angiogenic
properties of vascular endothelial growth factor in human
endothelial cells. J Clin Invest 1997;100:3131-9.
34. Zeng G, Quon MJ. Insulin-stimulated production
of nitric oxide is inhibited by wortmannin. J Clin Invest
1996;98: 894-8.
35. Saward L, Zahradka P. Angiotensin II activates
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in vascular smooth muscle cells.
Circ Res 1997;81:249-57.
36. Ushio-Fukai M, Alexander RW, Akers M, Yin Q, Fujio
Y, Walsh K, Griendling KK. Reactive oxygen species mediate
the activation of Akt/protein kinase B by angiotensin II in
vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem 1999; 274:22699-704.
37. Nishimatsu H, Suzuki E, Nagata D, Moriyama N, Satonaka
H, Walsh K, Saata M, Kangawa K, Matsuo H, Goto A, Kitamura
T, Hirata Y. Adrenomedullin induces endothelium-dependent
vasorelaxation via the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt-dependent
pathway in rat aorta. Circ Res 2001;89:63-70.
38. Miller VM. Gender and vascular reactivity. Lupus.
1999;8:409-15.
39. Selzman CH, Whitehill TA, Shames BD, Pulido EJ,
Cain BC, Harken AH. The biology of estrogen-mediated repair
of cardiovascular injury. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:868-74.
40. Nadal A, Ropero AB, Fuentes E, Soria B. The plasma
membrane estrogen receptor: nuclear or unclear? Trends Pharmacol
Sci 2001;22:597-9.
41. Kuiper GG, Enmark E, Pelto-Huikko M, Nilsson S,
Gustafsson JA. Cloning of a novel receptor expressed in rat
prostate and ovary. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93: 5925-30.
42. Kuiper GG. Comparison of the ligand binding specificity
and transcript tissue distribution of estrogen receptors alpha
and beta. Endocrinology 1997;138:863-70.
43. Paech K. Differential ligand activation of estrogen
receptors ERalpha and ERbeta at AP1 sites. Science 1997;277:
1508-10.
44. Lindner V. Increased expression of estrogen receptor-beta
mRNA in male blood vessels after vascular injury. Circ Res
1998;83:224-9.
45. Karas RH, Patterson BL, Mendelsohn ME. Human vascular
smooth muscle cells contain functional estrogen receptor.
Circulation 1994;89:1943-50.
46. Iafrati MD, Karas RH, Aronovitz M, Kim S, Sullivan
TR, Lubahn DB, O'Donnell TF, Korach KS, Mendelsohn ME. Estrogen
inhibits the vascular injury response in estrogen receptor
a-deficient mice. Nature Medicine 1997;3:545-8.
47. Karas RH, Schulten H, Pare G, Aronovitz MJ, Ohlsson
C, Gustafsson JA, Mendelsohn ME. Effects of estrogen on the
vascular injury response in estrogen receptor a,b (Double)
knockout mice. Circ Res 2001;89:534-9.
48. Zhu Y, Bian Z, Lu P, Karas RH, Bao L, Cox D, Hodgin
J, Shaul PW, Thoren, Smithies O, Gustafsson JA, Mendelsohn
ME. Abnormal vascular function and hypertension in mice deficient
in estrogen receptor b. Science 2002;295:505-8.
49. Darblade B, Pendaries C, Krust A, Dupont S, Fouque
MJ, Rami J, Chambon P, Bayard F, Arnal JF. Estradiol alters
nitric oxide production in the mouse aorta through the a-,
but not b-, estrogen receptor. Circ Res 2002;90:413-9.
50. Xin HB, Senbonmatsu T, Cheng DS, Wang YX, Copello
JA, Ji GJ, Coller ML, Deng KY, Jeyakumar LH, Magnuson MA,
Inagami T, Kotlikoff MI, Fleischer S. Oestrogen protects FKBP12.6
null mice from cardiac hypertrophy. Nature 2002;416:334-7.
51. Hodgin JB, Krege JH, Reddick RL, Korach KS, Smithies
O and Maeda N. Estrogen receptor a is a major mediator of
17b-estradiol's atheroprotective effects on lesion size in
apoe-/- mice. J Clin Invest 2001;107:333-40.
52. Barrett-Connor E. Sex differences in coronary heart
disease. Circulation 1997;95:252-64.
53. Barrett-Connor E, Grady D. Hormone replacement
therapy, heart disease, and other considerations. Annu Rev
Public Health 1998;19:55-72.
54. Grodstein F, Manson JE, Colditz GA, Willett WC,
Speizer FE, Stampfer MJ. A prospective, observational study
of postmenopausal hormone therapy and primary prevention of
cardiovascular disease. Ann Intern Med 2000;133:933-41.
55. Manson JE, Martin KA. Postmenopausal hormone-replacement
therapy. New Engl J Med 2001;345:34-40.
56. Mosca L, Collins P, Herrington DM, Mendelsohn ME,
Pasternak RC, Robertson RM, Schenck-Gustafsson K, Smith SC,
Taubert KA, Wenger NK. Hormone replacement therapy and cardiovascular
disease. Circulation 2001;104:499-507.
57. Razandi M, Pedram A and Levin ER. Estrogen signals
to the preservation of endothelial cell form and function.
J Biol Chem. 2000;275:38540-6.
58. Caulin-Glaser T, Garcia-Cardena G, Sarrel P, Sessa
WC, Bender JR. 17b-estradiol regulation of human endothelial
cell basal nitric oxide release, independent of cytosolic
Ca2+ mobilization. Circ Res 1997;81:885-92.
59. Al-Mehdi AB, Song C, Tozawa K, Fisher AB. Ca2+-
and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-dependent nitric oxide generation
in lung endothelial cells in situ with ischemia. J Biol Chem.
2000;275:39807-10.
60. Igarashi J and Michel T. Sphingosine 1-phosphate
and isoform-specific activation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase
b. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:36281-8.
61. Fraser H, Davidge ST, Clanachan AS. Activation
of Ca2+ independent nitric oxide synthase by 17b-estradiol
in post-ischemic rat heart. Cardiovascular Res 2000;46:111-8.
|
 |
 |
|
From the Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, College
of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan.
Received: May 2, 2002; Accepted: Aug. 1, 2002
Address for reprints: Dr. Ying-Tung Lau, Department of Physiology
and Pharmacology, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University.
259, Wen-Haw 1st Rd., Kweishan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Tel.: 886-3-3283016 ext. 5095; Fax: 886-3-3283031; E-mail:
ytlau@mail.cgu.edu.tw
|
|