








 |
CGMH
Administration
Center |
No.199, Tunghwa Rd.,
Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C |

886-2-27135211 |
|
|
|
Factors Delaying Hospital Arrival after
Acute Stroke in Southern Taiwan |
|
Teng-Yeow Tan, MD
Ku-Chou Chang, MD
Chia-Wei Liou, MD
|
 |
 |
|
Background: Acute stroke management emphasizes prompt recognition
of symptoms and early medical attention. The effectiveness
of stroke treatment is highly dependent on amount of time
lapsed between onset of symptoms and treatment. In this study,
factors that delayed seeking medical attention after stroke
in southern Taiwan were explored.
Methods: This was a prospective one-center study in which
information was collected from patients who arrived at the
emergency department of the study hospital within 48 hours
after stroke onset. All the data were categorized into arrival
time less than 2 hours (T<2 hours) and from 2 to 48 hours
(T=2-48 hours) after stroke onset.
Results: There were 789 stroke patients screened and 197 (25%)
of them fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Among the 197 patients,
52 (26%) arrived at the study hospital within 2 hours of stroke
(median, 75 minutes) and 145 (74%) arrived between 2-48 hours
(median, 575 minutes). Among patients with T=2-48 hours, 47
(24%) patients initially sought medical attention at other
hospitals or clinics within 2 hours. The factors associated
with T=2-48 hours included interhospital transfer, location
of stroke onset, first aid at outpatient clinic, and lack
of awareness of emergent medical help for stroke.
Conclusion: Significant prehospital delays for stroke patients
exist in Taiwan. The implementation of well designed, effective
public health programs, coordination of stroke centers within
the community hospitals, and effective emergent medical service
system are needed to minimize the time to evaluation and treatment
of stroke. Because of the high population density and the
high incidence of stroke in Taiwan, the programs mentioned
above could have a major impact on improving the care of stroke
patients.
(Chang Gung Med J 2002;25:458-63)
Key words: prehospital-delayed, acute stroke, emergency medical
service, hospital, treatment.
Stroke is the second leading cause of mortality in Taiwan.(1)
The incidence rate of first-ever stroke in Taiwan is 330 per
100,000 population aged older than 36 years and, 71% of these
events are cerebral infarctions.(2) Recent reports have established
the utility of intensive medical and surgical intervention
in the hyperacute treatment of stroke. Stroke should be managed
as a medical emergency similar to that given to acute myocardial
infarction. Stroke had received a great deal of attention
in Taiwan after the positive results of ischemic stroke therapy
with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) given
within 3 hours after stroke.(3) One of the specific in-hospital
time-related goals of the National Institute of Neurological
Disorders and Stroke treatment guidelines is 60 minutes from
the door to drug administration in acute stroke management.(4)
Acute stroke management emphasizes prompt recognition of symptoms
and early medical attention.(5-7) Minimizing any delay for
the stroke victims arriving in the emergency room is important
for the initiation of acute management. Prehospital delays
comprise the majority of time from symptom onset to potential
treatment. Several factors(8-14) affect the interval from
stroke onset to hospital admission. We conducted this study
to explore the factors that caused the delay hospital arrival
in acute stroke patients in southern Taiwan.
METHODS
This study was conducted in an area with three million habitants
in southern Taiwan, one of the 17 Emergency Medical Service
(EMS) regions. Twenty-seven hospitals including 3 medical
centers and 24 community hospitals are located in this area.
All hospitals provide 24-hour computed tomography (CT) scanning
and laboratory facilities located adjacent to the respective
emergency departments (ED). Only the patients in the study
hospital were enrolled. The inclusion criteria were patients
with focal neurological symptoms of presumed vascular origin
and who sought help at ED within 48 hours of onset of symptoms.
Exclusion criteria were patients who sought help after 48
hours after stroke symptoms occurred, lack of specification
of time on symptoms onset, and patients or families who were
unwilling to participate the study. Patients arrived at ED
with an initial suspicion of stroke were evaluated by a neurologist.
Once the diagnosis of stroke was made, patients were then
admitted to the neurology department. All patients had a CT
scan study either in the study hospital or other hospitals.
A preset structured interview with the patients, families,
relatives or witnesses was made within 48 hours of hospital
admission. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale assessment
was performed as the severity of stroke. Time of onset was
defined as the time the patient or an observer first noted
a neurological deficit. If the stroke was found on awakening,
the time of onset was considered as the time when the patient
last fell asleep. Patients with arrival time less than 2 hours
(T<2 hours) from the onset of symptoms was compared to
those with arrival time between 2-48 hours (T=2-48 hours).
Student t-test and Chi-square testing were used to compare
the characteristics of patients between T<2 hours and those
with T=2-48 hours. Medians, means and standard deviation were
used to describe continuous data.
RESULTS
From September 1998 to March 1999, 1152 persons were admitted
to the neurological ward. There were 789 stroke patients screened
and 197 (25%) of them fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All
the enrolled patients had a structured interview within 48
hours after admission.
The characteristics of the 197 eligible stroke or transient
ischemic attack (TIA) patients and stroke are presented in
Table 1 and Table 2. Eighty five percent of the patients had
ischemic stroke or TIA and 15% had intracerebral hemorrhage.
Seventy- eight percent of the patients were first-ever stroke
and 22% were recurrent stroke. The mean age for the entire
group of patients was 63.3 years. Among the stroke risk factors,
54% had hypertension, 31% diabetes mellitus, 17% tobacco consumption,
11% family history of stroke, 6% hyperlipidemia, and 5% peripheral
vascular disease or angina. Nineteen percent had been unconscious
from symptom onset, 67% paresis, 31% speech disturbance, 15%
sensory disturbance, 28% vertigo/dizziness and 4% headache
as initial symptoms. Twenty-one percent had the idea of not
needing emergent medical help for stroke.
Among the 197 patients, 52 (26%) patients arrived at the study
hospital within 2 hours. There was other 47 (23%) patients
sought medical attention at other hospitals or clinics within
2 hours. Twenty- two percent were transported by ambulance
and only 11 patients used EMS in T<2 hours group. Among
the 8 patients who were transferred from other hospitals,
7 patients used ambulance to reach the study hospital. There
were 33 patients used EMS in T=2-48 hours group and among
the 78 patients who were transferred from other hospitals,
25 patients used ambulance and 53 patients used private car
or taxi to reach study hospital. The average transportation
time and time delay were 35.6 and 406.5 minutes respectively.
Six percent sought first aid at outpatient clinic of the study
hospital and 33% received initial treatment at other hospitals.
Forty-four percent was referred from other hospitals.
Interhospital transfer, location of stroke onset, first aid
at outpatient clinic and delayed medical management due to
unawareness of emergent medical help hinder the timely seeking
medical attention (Table 3).
DISCUSSION
Significant prehospital delays were evident in this study.
There was only 6.6% of the stroke patients screened could
arrive in the study hospital within 2 hours after symptoms
onset. However, there was 26% of the enrolled acute stroke
patients sought medical attention in the study hospital within
2 hours after symptoms were identified. As compared with 30-60%
of the acute stroke patients arrived in the ED within 3 hours
of symptoms onset in other studies,(15) our results are encouraging
and feasible to set up acute stroke therapy or conduct trials
in this area. With the other 23% of the enrolled acute stroke
patients could seek medical attention other than the study
hospital within 2 hours after symptoms onset, and the possible
eligible patients excluded from this study, further studies
and efforts to explore the factors facilitating transfer of
patients in this area are needed. The knowledge of stroke
as an emergency medical problem was sparse among the patients
or caregivers, and this was due to the low education level
among them or the poor public medical education in this area.
In this study, 77% of the patients and 58% of the caregivers
were below junior high graduates or were illiterate. The difference
of education levels influencing stroke management were poorly
understood and the impact of low educational levels on stroke
management needs further study.
Although most of the patients or families expressed the understanding
of the emergent need to send the patients for help, there
were still a high percentage of the patients who arrived between
2-48 hours. The possible delay can be explained by the late
recognition of the symptoms of stroke. No matter who decided
to seek medical attention, patients tend to arrive late at
hospitals. Cultural factors and lack of knowledge about stroke
were possible causes. In Taiwan, many people especially the
elderly, are reluctant to seek medical attention unless being
advised. Patients or family members often think that the symptoms
might go away by themselves. Also, our results did not suggest
that the experiences from previous stroke or family history
of stroke contributed to minimize the delay in arriving ED
earlier.
In this study, the emergency department of the study hospital
is within 2-hour traffic distance for patients in the catchment
area. For patients in the catchment area but with those arrived
in the study hospital 2-48 hours after symptoms onset were
those who initially sought first aid at nearby hospitals or
clinics. They were transferred to the study hospital when
there was no improvement or even deterioration of the symptoms.
Patients who were transferred from other hospitals always
arrived between 2-48 hours. This lag of time eliminated the
chance for emergent treatment after stroke. Two studies conducted
in northern Taiwan had shown the similar results.(16,17) This
kind of delay needs to be reduced when acute therapies, such
as intravenous rt-PA or intraarterial thrombolysis, are available.(18,19)
Regional plans need to be developed so that the patients with
acute stroke are treated at regional hospitals or promptly
transfer to hospitals where treatments are available. This
may mean that some patients bypass hospitals that do not have
stroke therapies available.
The average time to reach a hospital was less than 45 minutes
in this study. The access to a hospital was not a hindrance
in this area. Previous reports showed that use of EMS was
independently associated with earlier arrival,(20,21) and
55% of the patients in one study were transported to ED by
ambulance. The percentage of patients using EMS in our study
was low, and only 22% of our patients arrived by ambulance.
Patients not using EMS were not associated with late arrival
in this study. This finding may be related to our compact
geographic region. The majority of our patients arrived by
other vehicles instead of ambulance. Although EMS system plays
a major role in an out-of-hospital emergency services, but
in this area, using all available vehicles instead of ambulance
to rush to the hospital after stroke symptoms was recognized
and should not be discouraged.
Although other studies had demonstrated the influence of stroke
types in hospital arrival,(7,17,22) our results showed no
difference of hospital arrival between infarction and hemorrhagic
stroke patients, neither the admission delay related to the
initial severity of the stroke. These offer a chance to screen
most of the stroke patients for the eligibility of acute stroke
therapy from the easily accessed medical facilities.
In this study, our data do show the characteristics of acute
stroke patients in southern Taiwan and explored the factors
contributed to the presentation of these events. Our results
offer important and useful information to the physicians and
the public for the management of acute stroke. It is needed
he need for implementation of effective public health programs
designed to minimize the time to evaluation and treatment
of stroke, coordination of a stroke center within the community
hospitals, and providing an effective EMS system to overcome
the problems. These results may be useful in strategic planning
for stroke management.
|
 |
 |
|
REFERENCES
1. Department of Health, Executive Yuan of Taiwan. Health
Statistic Annual, Republic of China 1971-1998. Taipei, Taiwan,
ROC: National Health Administration; 1998.
2. Hu HH, Sheng WY, Chu FL, Lan CF, Chiang BN. Incidence of
stroke Taiwan. Stroke 1992;23:1237-41.
3. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
rt-PA Stroke Study Group: Tissue plasminogen activator for
acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 1995; 333:1581-7.
4. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
(NINDS): Proceedings of a National Symposium on Rapid Identification
and Treatment of Acute Stroke, Washington, 1997.
5. Adams HP Jr, Brott TG, Crowell RM, Furlan AJ, Gomez CR,
Grotta J, Helgason CM, Marler JR, Woolson RF, Zivin JA. Guidelines
for the management of patients with acute ischemic stroke.
A statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing
group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Stroke
1994;25: 1901-14.
6. Langhorne P, Williams BO, Gilchrist W, Howie K. Do stroke
units save lives? Lancet. 1993;342:395-8.
7. Davalos A, Castillo J, Martinez-Vila E. Delay in neurological
attention and stroke outcome. Cerebrovascular Diseases Study
Group of the Spanish Society of Neurology. Stroke 1995;26:2233-7.
8. Alberts MJ, Bertels C, Dawson DV. An analysis of time of
presentation after stroke. JAMA 1990;263:65-8.
9. Harper GD, Haigh RA, Potter JF, Castleden CM. Factors delaying
hospital admission after stroke in Leicestershire. Stroke
1992;23:835-8.
10. Barsan WG, Brott TG, Broderick JP, Haley EC, Levy DE,
Marler JR. Time of hospital presentation in patients with
acute stroke. Arch Intern Med 1993;153:2558-61.
11. Anderson NE, Broad JB, Bonita R. Delays in hospital admission
and investigation in acute stroke. BMJ 1995; 311:162.
12. Wester P, Radberg J, Lundgren B, Peltonen M. Factors associated
with delayed admission to hospital and in-hospital delays
in acute stroke and TIA: a prospective, multicenter study.
Stroke 1999;30:40-8.
13. Bratina P, Greenberg L, Pasteur W, Grotta JC. Current
emergency department management of stroke in Houston, Texas.
Stroke 1995;26:409-14.
14. Azzimondi G, Bassein L, Fiorani L, Nonino F, Montaguti
U, Celin D, Re G, DĠAlessandro R. Variable associated with
hospital arrival time after stroke: effect of delay on the
clinical efficiency of early treatment. Stroke 1997; 28:537-42.
15. Evenson KR, Rosamond WD, Morris DL. Prehospital and in-hospital
delays in acute stroke care. Neuroepidemi-ology 2001;20:65-76.
16. Lin CS, Tsai J, Woo P, Chang H. Prehospital delay and
emergency department management of ischemic stroke patients
in Taiwan, R.O.C. Prehosp Emerg Care 1999;3: 194-200.
17. Yip PK, Jeng JS, Lu CJ. Hospital arrival time after onset
of different types of stroke in greater Taipei. J Formos Med
Assoc 2000;99:532-7.
18. Keris V, Rudnicka S, Vorona V, Enina G, Tilgale B, Fricbergs
J. Combined intraarterial/intravenous thrombolysis for acute
ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:352-8.
19. Jahan R, Duckwiler GR, Kidwell CS, Sayre JW, Gobin YP,
Villablanca JP, Saver J, Starkman S, Martin N, Vinuela F.
Intraarterial thrombolysis for treatment of acute stroke:
experience in 26 patients with long-term follow-up. AJNR Am
J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1291-9.
20. Kothari R, Jauch E, Broderick J, Brott T, Sauerbeck L,
Khoury J, Liu T. Acute stroke: delays to presentation and
emergency department evaluation. Ann Emerg Med 1999; 33:3-8.
21. Morris DL, Rosamond W, Madden K, Schultz C, Hamilton S.
Prehospital and emergency department delays after acute stroke:
the Genentech Stroke Presentation Survey. Stroke 2000;31:2585-90.
22. Fogelholm R, Murros K, Rissanen A, Ilmavirta M. Factors
delaying hospital admission after acute stroke. Stroke 1996;27:398-400.
|
 |
 |
|
From the First Department of Neurology, Chang Gung Memorial
Hospital, Kaohsiung.
Received: Jul. 24, 2001; Accepted: Apr. 9, 2002
Address for reprints: Dr. Ku-Chou Chang, the First Department
of Neurology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. 123, Ta-Pei Road,
Niaosung, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, R.O.C. Tel: 886-7-7317123 ext.
2283; Fax: 886-7-7318762; E-mail: tengyeowtan@yahoo.com
|
|